The political left-right divide originates in the French Revolution of the late 18th century. Ever since it has dominated Western, and eventually World politics. Most countries in the world have political factions of some kind that are described as either left-wing or right-wing. I will focus on the state of the modern Right, and what it means to be right-wing.
The Right is usually described as being pro-free market capitalism and conservative on social issues. This is the key issue in the future of the Right. Which matters more, social or economic issues? Establishment right-wing organizations like Turning Point USA largely focus on economic issues, largely ignoring issues like legal immigration and moral degeneration. When it talks about social issues, they often take Liberal/left-wing positions, being all for mass immigration and clearly unchristian moral standards. This type of rightism has been dominant for a long time in most western countries. However, this has started to change in recent years.
Starting in Europe, increased globalization at the expense of local communities, growing EU centralization, mindless progressivism and, most importantly, large-scale non-European immigration has paved the way for new Nationalist and National-Conservative parties, such as the Finns Party, the Sweden Democrats, the Alternative for Germany, the National Rally (of France) and many more throughout Europe. Their popularity has skyrocketed – The Finns Party, for example, has been polling as by far the most popular party of Finland after the last election in April. These parties primarily focus on immigration and other social issues, varying greatly when it comes to economic policy. Many of the parties here would be described as economically left-wing by some. In any case, right-wing populism has been a great success so far, and it will likely keep growing. In many countries the new Nationalist party have already outgrown the traditional Conservative party.
The political Right of the United States is now at a crossroads. The nomination and eventual election of Donald Trump in 2016 is possibly the most decisive political event in decades. It shattered the old concensus of the Republican Party, which is undergoing a severe identity crisis. The electoral system only allows for two real parties, so the future of the Republicans is the future of the U.S. Right. Many prominent Nationalist and hardcore Social Conservatives have emerged since then, no doubt due to the rise of Trump. No matter what you think about how well he has lived up to the expectations, Trump’s election is likely the reason there are so many people running around who advocate for ending legal immigration from the Third World. This could have happened without him too, of course, but Trump was no doubt a major factor.
It has been said by many that Conservatism conserves nothing, and I have to agree. Many mainstream Conservatives advocate for social policies that would have been radically progressive even ten years ago. I’m looking at you, Charlie Kirk. I believe that we should not call these people conservatives at all. If you don’t have to be socially conservative to be a Conservative, what differentiates it from Neoliberalism or Libertarianism? It is no wonder that the “groyper uprising” happened. It was true Conservatives standing up to corporate “Conservatism” by challenging people like Kirk and Dan Crenshaw, and exposing who they really were. A fellow by the name of Nick Fuentes has largely been behind this all, and although I don’t agree with literally every single thing he has ever said, I must say that he has been unfairly smeared by the mainstream Right, who use the same smear tactics that leftists use. They decry censorship while doing it to those they don’t like at the same time. Even people who dare defend the outcast get the same treatment, as was the case with Michelle Malkin. “Conservative Inc.”, as it has been dubbed, cares more about not being called racist than stopping the demographic replacement that it taking place this very moment. Every day America becomes roughly .001% points less white on average. This is absolutely critical for many reasons that I won’t go into now. But so simplify, non-whites vote overwhelmingly left-wing, and this has been the case for a long time, and I’m sceptical it’ll change anytime soon. More non-whites means more left-wing voters. It doesn’t matter if you’re white or non-white. If you’re on the Right, you should be worried about this trend. Fake Conservatives will do anything to silence all discussion about this matter.
Reject fake Conservatism, embrace true Christian Conservatism, and make sure to go to church as often as you can.
The Karelian Lakelander 